Intellectual Property Law Section

The Intellectual Property Law Section keeps its members up-to-date on issues relating to the practice area, including patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret law. We accomplish this by having quarterly Section luncheons featuring relevant topics, discussions and knowledgeable speakers.

The IP Section also joins forces with CIPLA to participate in the Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Buckeye Breakaway Ride each year.  Our 2015 team photo is below:

  IP Team Photo 


Robert A. Jefferis   


 Driggs Hogg Daugherty & DelZoppo Co., LPA 



The discussion questions for the Section's December 2014 roundtable are as follows: 

 What is the abstract idea that the SCOTUS identifies in Alice Corp v. CLS Bank?

What is the test that the SCOTUS identifies for Section 101 eligible subject matter?

What is the public interest that the SCOTUS expresses concern regarding eligible subject matter? Is this any different that O’Reilly v. Morse, 56 U.S. 62 (1853) with claim 8: “I do not propose to limit myself to the specific machinery or parts of machinery described in the foregoing specification and claims; the essence of my invention being the use of the motive power of the electric or galvanic current, which I call electro-magnetism, however developed for marking or printing intelligible characters, signs, or letters, at any distance, being a new application of that power of which I claims to be the first inventor or discoverer”?

Is the SCOTUS mixing Section 101 analysis with Sections 102 and 103?

According to the USPTO examining guidelines, what are examples of abstract ideas? When are claims directed to an abstract idea eligible subject matter?

What is the abstract idea that the Federal Circuit identifies in Ultramercial v. Hulu? Why does claim 1 not offer significantly more than the abstract idea?

When is a claim directed to an abstract idea patient eligible subject matter?

What guidance does Ultramercial offer to practitioners?

What have you observed in your practice related to Alice and what guidance would you offer in preparing applications, responding to office actions, or facing litigation involving a invalidity determination?


Materials for the Section's December 2014 roundtable discussion are available here to download: 

SCOTUS Alice decision

USPTO memo to Examining Corp

Fed Cir decision Ultramercial v. Hulu from this month citing Alice  

View our events calendar.